Why the study?
Does anticoagulation reduce thrombo-embolic events compared to aspirin in heart failure patients with low ejection fraction and sinus rhythm?
Does anticoagulation reduce thrombo-embolic events compared to aspirin in heart failure patients with low ejection fraction and sinus rhythm?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel oral anticoagulants should be tested in heart failure patients with low ejection fraction and sinus rhythm to balance thrombo-embolic protection and bleeding risk.
Heart failure patients present an important thrombo-embolic risk, including symptomatic or silent peripheral arterial embolism, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. Patients in sinus rhythm who have concomitant depressed (< 35%) left ventricular ejection fraction have a 4% rate of embolic events. Several prospective randomized trials of anticoagulation in this group of patients were either underpowered or had a short period of follow-up. Even though in two studies warfarin had a slight advantage over aspirin (in the WATCH and WARCEF trials), it was at the cost of an increased risk in major hemorrhage. To decrease bleeding rates and to improve anticoagulant effect, new treatment strategies have to be tested. Novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) seem to be a promising alternative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mischie et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: