Key result
Significant carotid stenosis accounts for only ~41% of ischemic stroke or TIA cases.
Observational (n=158)
The traditional classification of asymptomatic versus symptomatic carotid stenosis may be obsolete, emphasizing the need for comprehensive systemic atherosclerosis management in all patients.
Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between "asymptomatic" and "symptomatic" presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of current studies on interventional treatment versus surgery. Both terms, however, only address different phases of activity of the one and the same condition and blur the significant message that carotid stenosis is a most important marker of systemic atherosclerosis, which is accompanied by a much higher risk of cardiovascular events rather than stroke. As a consequence, early diagnosis and followup during best medical treatment, life-style management, regular cardiovascular assessment, and good control of all vascular risk factors should be recommended in all patients with carotid stenosis-whether identified in the long-lasting "silent" or short-lasting "vulnerable" period lasting only a few weeks after cerebral ischemia. Patients in this short time window benefit from additional carotid intervention, under the condition of an individually favorable benefit-risk ratio ("individual vulnerability").
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzikonstantinou et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke or TIA with carotid stenosis ≥50% (n=158). Carotid stenosis ≥50% was evaluated on Proportion of patients where carotid stenosis was the probable cause of the ischemic event (ASCO grade A1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: