Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The length of time T M over which a glacier responds to a prior change in climate is investigated with reference to the linearized theory of kinematic waves and to results from numerical models. We show the following: T M may in general be estimated by a volume time-scale describing the time required for a step change in mass balance to supply the volume difference between the initial and final steady states. The factor f in the classical estimate of τ M = ƒl/u , where I is glacier length and u is terminus velocity, has a simple geometrical interpretation. Ft is the ratio of thickness change averaged over the full length I to the change at the terminus. Although both u and f relate to dynamic processes local to the terminus zone, the ratio f/u and, therefore, T m are insensitive to details of the terminus dynamics, in contrast to conclusions derived from some simplified kinematic wave models. A more robust estimate of T m independent of terminus dynamics is given by T M = h/(–b) where h is a thickness scale for the glacier and –b is the mass-balance rate (negative) at the terminus. We suggest that T m for mountain glaciers can be substantially less than the 1O 2 –10 3 years commonly considered to be theoretically expected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jøhannesson et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: