Key result
Cystatin C GFR yielded significantly lower GFR estimates than Creatinine GFR in diabetic patients with kidney dysfunction (P<0.05), indicating it is a more sensitive marker for early renal injury.
Why the study?
Diabetic and hypertensive patients experience decreased glomerular function, but creatinine rises only after over 50% of function is lost, creating a need for more accurate GFR prediction.
Does Cystatin C GFR estimation provide more accurate prediction of renal dysfunction than Creatinine GFR in diabetic patients?
Observational (n=57)
No
Does Cystatin C GFR estimation provide more accurate prediction of renal dysfunction than Creatinine GFR in diabetic patients?
p-value: p=<0.05
Cystatin C provides a more sensitive and accurate estimation of GFR compared to creatinine, allowing for earlier detection of renal dysfunction in diabetic patients.
Diabetic and hypertensive patients gradually gets decreased glomerular function. Creatinine starts rising and exhibits decreased kidney function when more than 50% of glomerular function is lost. Cystatin C, a parameter which accesses kidney function accurately predicts GFR. GFR is calculated by measuring Cystatin C and Creatinine. Groups were normal patients, diabetics patients, Comparison of changes of pre and post treatment GFR by Creatinine and Cystatin. Total 57 patient studied 1) Cystatin C GFR is lower than creatinine GFR in 20 normal patients with P value with paired t test is 0.0032 hence prompts early renal evaluation whereas creatinine GFR overestimates renal function. 2) cystatin C GFR in 37 patients with kidney dysfunction and diabetes is less than Creatine GFR with p-value < 0.05 suggests more accurate prediction for renal injury. 3) Cystatin GFR is affected by age and gender 4) Change in Pre and Post treatment of 9 patients with creatinine GFR and cystatin GFR with p-value = 0.47657 > 0.05 but these patients high Creatinine levels on admission which gets normalised with remarkable rise in GFR whereas Cystatin C levels gets marginally decrease suggests renal recovery ongoing. Clearly exhibits Creatinine GFR is overestimates renal function. Patients with normal GFR by Creatinine having raised Cystatin C levels prompts early renal evaluation. Cystatin C is accurately estimating, less affected by variables and predicting severity of renal dysfunction. Thus, Cystatin C GFR better diagnostic and sensitive maker than creatinine GFR for accurate prediction of renal dysfunction in Diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nimbolkar et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Diabetes and kidney dysfunction (n=57). Cystatin C GFR vs. Creatinine GFR was evaluated on GFR estimation (p=<0.05). Cystatin C GFR yielded significantly lower GFR estimates than Creatinine GFR in diabetic patients with kidney dysfunction (P<0.05), indicating it is a more sensitive marker for early renal injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: