Key result
Metabolically healthy obesity was associated with a higher odds of coronary artery calcification compared with metabolically healthy non-obese individuals (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66).
Why the study?
Studies evaluating whether individuals with metabolically healthy obesity have a similar risk of cardiovascular disease compared to metabolically healthy non-obese individuals have shown conflicting results.
Does metabolically healthy obesity increase the risk of coronary artery calcification compared to metabolically healthy non-obese individuals?
Meta-Analysis (n=23,543)
Does metabolically healthy obesity increase the risk of coronary artery calcification compared to metabolically healthy non-obese individuals?
Odds Ratio: 1.36 (95% CI 1.11–1.66)
Metabolically healthy obesity is associated with an elevated risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis compared to metabolically healthy non-obese individuals, suggesting that obesity itself carries cardiovascular risk even without multiple metabolic abnormalities.
MHO may warrant CAC vigilance despite metabolic health; extends observational data but leaves open intervention effects.
Background: Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) is defined as obesity with less than 2 parameters of metabolic abnormalities.Some studies report that MHO individuals show similar risk of cardiovascular disease(CVD) compared with metabolically healthy non-obese(MHNO) individuals, but the results are conflicting.Coronary artery calcium (CAC) reflects the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and is a useful tool to predict future risk of CVD.The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether MHO is associated with elevated risk of CAC. Method:We searched Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase up to April 19, 2019.Prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies examining the association between MHO subjects and CAC were included with MHNO as the reference.Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effect models.Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were applied to define possible sources of heterogeneity.We conducted this research following a pre-established protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42019135006).Results: A total of nine studies were included in this review and six studies with 23,543 participants were eligible for the meta-analysis.Compared with MHNO subjects, MHO had a higher odds of CAC (OR 1.36, 95% CI [1.11 to 1.66]; I 2 =39%).In the subgroup analysis, the risk associated with MHO participants was significant in cohort studies (OR =1.47, 95% CI [1.15,1.87],I 2 =0%), and borderline significant in cross-sectional studies.The risk of CAC was also significant in MHO participants defined by Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) (OR =1.55, 95% CI [1.25,1.93],I 2 =0%).The univariate meta-regression model showed that age and smoking status were possible effect modifiers for MHO and CAC risk. Conclusion:Our meta-analysis showed that MHO phenotypes were associated with elevated risk of CAC compared with MHNO, which reflects the extent of coronary atherosclerosis.People with obesity should strive to achieve normal weight even when only one metabolic abnormality is present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2020 study conducted a meta-analysis in Metabolically healthy obesity (n=23,543). Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) vs. Metabolically healthy non-obese (MHNO) was evaluated on Coronary artery calcification (CAC) (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66). Metabolically healthy obesity was associated with a higher odds of coronary artery calcification compared with metabolically healthy non-obese individuals (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: