Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A dynamic view of performance evaluation is proposed that argues that raterswho are provided with negative performance data on a previously promotedemployee will subsequently evaluate the employee more positively if they, ratherthan their predecessors, made the earlier promotion decision. A total of 298business majors participated in the study. The experimental group made a pro-motion decision by choosing among three candidates, whereas the control groupwas told that the decision had been made by someone else. Both groups evaluatedthe promoted employee's performance after reviewing 2 years of data. The hy-pothesized escalation of commitment effect was observed in that the experimentalgroup consistently evaluated the employee more favorably, provided larger re-wards, and made more optimistic projections of future performance than did thecontrol group.After a long history of attempting to identifyoptimal performance appraisal instruments andtechniques (cf. Landy & Farr, 1980), recent re-search has moved towards studies that describethe processes involved in making a judgmentabout performance (Borman, 1975; Feldman,1981; Schneier, 1977; Zedeck & Kafry, 1977).This article represents this latter paradigm andspecifically addresses the dynamic processes thatoccur within a rater across multiple judgments ofthe same ratee. It is concerned with a longitudinalview of the rating process in order to focus onjudgmental demands associated with rating thesame ratee at multiple points in time. This articlepresents: (a) a brief review of the trend towardsunderstanding rating processes, (b) presentationof a longitudinal viewpoint, (c) development ofa set of hypotheses from this new viewpoint, and(d) discussion of the results of the empirical testof these hypotheses.The traditional view of performance evaluationassumes that a rater has both a complete set ofinformation about the behavior of the ratee andan organizationally provided performance ap-praisal instrument. The instrument provides the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazerman et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: