Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hg(2+) ions are bound to a 1,4-benzenedimethanethiol (BDMT) monolayer assembled on a Au electrode. Electrochemical reduction of the Hg(2+)-BDMT monolayer to Hg(+)-BDMT (at E degrees =0.48 V) and subsequently to Hg(0)-BDMT (at E degrees =0.2 V) proceeds with electron-transfer rate constants of 8 and 11 s(-1), respectively. The Hg(0) atoms cluster into aggregates that exhibit dimensions of 30 nm to 2 microm, within a time interval of minutes. Electrochemical oxidation of the nanoclusters to Hg(+) and further oxidation to Hg(2+) ions proceeds with electron-transfer rate constants corresponding to 9 and 43 s(-1), respectively, and the redistribution of Hg(2+) on the thiolated monolayer occurs within approximately 15 s. The reduction of the Hg(2+) ions to the Hg(0) nanoclusters and their reverse electrochemical oxidation proceed without the dissolution of mercury species to the electrolyte, implying high affinities of Hg(2+), Hg(+), and Hg(0) to the thiolated monolayer. The electrochemical transformation of the Hg(2+)-thiolated monolayer to the Hg(0)-nanocluster-functionalized monolayer is characterized by electrochemical means, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact-angle measurements. The Hg(0)-nanocluster-modified surface reveals enhanced hydrophobicity (contact angle 76 degrees ) as compared to the Hg(2+)-thiolated monolayer (contact angle 57 degrees ). The hydrophobic properties of the Hg(0)-nanocluster-modified electrode are further supported by force measurements employing a hydrophobically modified AFM tip.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riskin et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: