One of the main reasons why Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) systems are currently not widely used lies in their high resource consumption: <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3f+1$</tex-math> replicas are required to tolerate only <tex-math notation="LaTeX">f</tex-math> faults. Recent works have been able to reduce the minimum number of replicas to <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2f+1$</tex-math> by relying on trusted subsystems that prevent a faulty replica from making conflicting statements to other replicas without being detected. Nevertheless, having been designed with the focus on fault handling, during normal-case operation these systems still use more resources than actually necessary to make progress in the absence of faults. This paper presents Resource-efficient Byzantine Fault Tolerance ( ReBFT ), an approach that minimizes the resource usage of a BFT system during normal-case operation by keeping <tex-math notation="LaTeX">f</tex-math> replicas in a passive mode. In contrast to active replicas, passive replicas neither participate in the agreement protocol nor execute client requests; instead, they are brought up to speed by verified state updates provided by active replicas. In case of suspected or detected faults, passive replicas are activated in a consistent manner. To underline the flexibility of our approach, we apply ReBFT to two existing BFT systems: PBFT and MinBFT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Distler et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: