Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary The model is based on the concept that there is an effective rooting depth above which all the inorganic N in the soil is equally available and below which all N is totally unavailable. The extent to which nitrate is leached below this depth is calculated from the excess rainfall over evapotranspiration and the water holding capacity of the soil. The model was tested against the results of N fertilizer experiments with lettuce, French beans and overwintered onions which had been carried out in at least 2 years (and often more) on adjacent sites of the same field. The yields from all of the experiments with each crop were plotted against the level of fertilizer applied and against the difference between that applied and that lost by leaching. Comparison of these graphs showed that correcting for leaching in this way greatly reduced the variability between the response curves. The model was also tested against the results of similar experiments with Brussels sprouts grown on different sites with different combinations of base and top dressing. The results showed that the poor response to top dressing could be explained by the relatively small amounts of N in the base dressing which were leached from the rooting zone of this crop. It appears that the model will enable worthwhile adjustments in N fertilizer dressings to be made for differences in rainfall, provided that leaching occurs during the early stages of crop growth when uptake is small.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian G. Burns (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: