Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals improved correctness enforcement in event-sourced systems, suggesting enhanced development workflows.
Event-Sourced Systems (ESSs) that adopt Domain-Driven Design (DDD) are becoming more popular because of their intuitive business process modeling and improved auditability, scalability, and flexibility. However, ensuring the correctness of domain models—particularly event-sourced aggregates (ESAs)—remains challenging. To address this, we propose root contracting, a novel, constrained, and lightweight adaptation of Design by Contract (DbC), specifying the precondition, postcondition, and class invariant exclusively at aggregate roots. Root contracting simplifies correctness enforcement by leveraging DDD principles aligned with DbC and the standardized ESA code structure. We offer uContract, a Java open-source utility that realizes root contracting, enabling automated verification of ESAs with configurable runtime overhead. Through performance evaluation and methodological discussion, we demonstrate that root contracting effectively bridges formal correctness with practical domain modeling. Our approach provides developers with a tool to streamline development workflows, potentially reducing testing overhead and supporting integration with methodologies like Behavior-Driven Development (BDD).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: