Key result
EphrinA1 is proposed as a candidate molecule with robust potential to overcome barriers in translating experimental myocardial infarct reduction strategies into viable therapeutics.
Why the study?
Reperfusion is not always feasible and formulating a viable therapeutic to significantly attenuate myocardial injury has remained elusive despite decades of cardioprotection research.
EphrinA1 is proposed as a promising candidate molecule to overcome current barriers in translating experimental cardioprotective strategies for myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for EphrinA1 in cardioprotection; leaves open its ability to translate experimental infarct reduction strategies.
Myocardial tissue damage that occurs during an ischemic event leads to a spiraling deterioration of cardiac muscle structural and functional integrity. Reperfusion is the only known efficacious strategy and is the most commonly used treatment to reduce injury and prevent remodeling. However, timing is critical, and the procedure is not always feasible for a variety of reasons. The complex molecular basis for cardioprotection has been studied for decades but formulation of a viable therapeutic that can significantly attenuate myocardial injury remains elusive. In this review, we address barriers to the development of a fruitful approach that will substantially improve the prognosis of those suffering from this widespread and largely unmitigated disease. Furthermore, we proffer that ephrinA1, a candidate molecule that satisfies many of the important criteria discussed, possesses robust potential to overcome these hurdles and thus offers protection that surpasses the limitations currently observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horton et al. (2019) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. ephrinA1 was evaluated. EphrinA1 is proposed as a candidate molecule with robust potential to overcome barriers in translating experimental myocardial infarct reduction strategies into viable therapeutics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: