Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper deals with developing and testing frequency-adaptive PMU algorithms with wider linearity range than specified in IEEE Std C37.118-1. This goal is achieved by means of three different concepts encompassing robust state-of-the-art design approaches: 1) FIR bandpass filtering, 2) extended Kalman filtering (EKF), and 3) discrete Fourier transform (DFT) demodulation with FIR low-pass smoothing. While FIR-based PMUs are linear phase with no overshoot in either phase or amplitude step responses, the adaptive EKF PMU is more computer-intensive but allows for a reduced group delay and better out-of-band interference rejection at the cost of a phase step response with overshoot. Frequency measurement performances of the various PMUs are assessed in detail. It turned out that FIR PMUs are best for meeting Std C37-118-1 metrics but they are outperformed by EKF under changing harmonics. Test results on three recent commercial PMU models further confirm that PMU algorithms meeting standard C37-118-1 can behave quite differently under dynamic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamwa et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: