Key result
Contactless infrared camera pulse measurement undergoes accuracy evaluation against wrist-worn oximetry during rest and exercise.
Why the study?
A light source outside the visible spectrum was needed to utilize image-based photoplethysmography without the blinding effect of high-intensity visible light.
Does contactless continuous pulse rate measurement using infrared imaging accurately monitor heart rate compared to a wrist-worn pulse oximeter?
Does contactless continuous pulse rate measurement using infrared imaging accurately monitor heart rate compared to a wrist-worn pulse oximeter?
Infrared image-based photoplethysmography offers a potential contactless method for continuous heart rate monitoring without the blinding effect of visible light.
Hypothesis-generating for contactless monitoring; leaves open validation in larger clinical cohorts.
Image-based photoplethysmography (iPPG) is a non-invasive contactless optical measurement method that has been used for heart rate monitoring. In this technology, a light source illuminates the skin's surface, and a photodetector measures the volumetric variations of blood circulation. A light source outside the visible spectrum had to be employed to utilize iPPG without the blinding effect of the high-intensity visible light source. In this pilot study, we evaluated a contactless continuous pulse rate measurement using infrared (IR) light and a high-speed camera. The IR light illuminates the facial region, and the high-speed camera, capable of capturing video frames at a high frame rate, records the reflected light, extracting iPPG signals from the captured video frames. The developed algorithm was tested in ten experiments under two conditions when the participants rested and exercised. A wrist-worn pulse oximeter was used as a reference. The article explains the image extraction and signal processing implementation process and demonstrates the results of a signal processing pipeline. In addition, the results of detected pulse rates were compared to the pulse oximeter measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smiley et al. (2023) studied this question. Contactless continuous pulse rate measurement using infrared (IR) light and a high-speed camera vs. Wrist-worn pulse oximeter was evaluated on Detected pulse rates compared to pulse oximeter measurements. Contactless continuous pulse rate measurement using infrared light and a high-speed camera was evaluated against a wrist-worn pulse oximeter in ten experiments during rest and exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: