Key result
Cangrelor shows no benefit over GPIs for achieving successful reperfusion during endovascular stroke treatment.
Why the study?
Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of cangrelor versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjunctive antiplatelet therapy during endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke were limited.
Does cangrelor improve procedural success and safety compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Meta-Analysis (n=616)
Yes
Does cangrelor improve procedural success and safety compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Relative Risk: 1.04 (95% CI 1–1.09)
p-value: p=0.07
Cangrelor may serve as a viable alternative to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles.
Cangrelor offers a comparable alternative to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for reperfusion success in endovascular stroke treatment; extends meta-analytic support for periprocedural antiplatelet options.
Endovascular treatment (EVT) plays a critical role in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To enhance reperfusion outcomes, intravenous antiplatelet agents such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) are commonly administered during EVT. cangrelor, a fast-acting, reversible P2Y12 inhibitor, has emerged as a potential alternative due to its rapid onset and offset of action. However, comparative data on its efficacy and safety relative to GPIs in this context are limited. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cangrelor versus GPIs as adjunctive antiplatelet therapies during EVT in AIS patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, with protocol registration on PROSPERO (CRD420251047232). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, through May 4, 2025. Studies comparing cangrelor and GPIs during EVT in AIS were included. Data on procedural success, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. Five studies including 616 participants (cangrelor: 318, GPIs: 298) were included. No significant difference was observed between groups in achieving the modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2b (RR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.00–1.09], P = 0.07), mTICI ≥ 2c (RR = 1.19 (95% CI [0.87, 1.61], P = 0.27), or mTICI ≥ 3 (RR = 1.07 (95% CI [0.81 to 1.42], p = 0.62). Safety outcomes, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality, were comparable. Despite limited data, current evidence indicates that cangrelor may serve as a viable alternative to GPIs in the EVT of AIS, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. However, definitive conclusions require validation through well-designed prospective randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellebedy et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (n=616). Cangrelor vs. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) was evaluated on Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2b (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09, p=0.07). Cangrelor showed no significant difference compared to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in achieving successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥ 2b) during endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke (RR 1.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: