Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines the role of civil society in Russian governance networks, focusing on power relations between state and non-state actors. The analysis is based on empirical evidence from concrete governance networks in two major cities, St. Petersburg and Samara, that handle complex social issues – integration of migrants, drug prevention, and child protection. Power asymmetries are reflected in tight state control of governance networks’ agenda, membership, and opportunity to affect policy. The governance networks are first and foremost advisory bodies with very limited decision-making authority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aasland et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: