Key result
Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate-dose tinzaparin in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was associated with a 2.06% rate of thrombotic events and a 2.6% rate of bleeding events.
Why the study?
Patients with active cancer face a 4-sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism particularly during systematic anticancer treatment, with surgery representing an additional risk factor.
Does tinzaparin prevent thrombotic events in ambulatory patients with active cancer undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment?
Cohort (n=291)
No
Does tinzaparin prevent thrombotic events in ambulatory patients with active cancer undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment?
Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate-dose tinzaparin is safe and effective in ambulatory patients with active cancer undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment.
Supports intermediate-dose tinzaparin for high-risk ambulatory cancer patients; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Patients with active cancer have a 4-sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) especially during systematic anticancer treatment. Simultaneously, surgery is an additional risk factor. METHODS: The Metaxas's Hospital THromboprophylaxis program in Oncological & Surgical Patients (MeTHOS) is a prospective, phase IV, observational, non-interventional cohort study, aiming to record the thromboprophylaxis practice patterns in high-risk active cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment. RESULTS: We are reporting results from 291 ambulatory patients (median age: 67 years, Q1-Q3: 59-73 years, 54.6% males) who received anti-neoplastic treatment and administered thromboprophylaxis. 59.8% had cardiovascular disease (mostly hypertension), 76.6% were reported as having at least one comorbidity, while 27.5% and 15.8% accumulated two and three comorbidities, respectively. 94.9% of the patients were receiving highly thrombogenic agents such as platinum-based agents, 5-FU, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics/anti-VEGF, or erythropoietin. 26.5% of the patients were initially surgically treated. In terms of anticoagulation, all patients were treated with tinzaparin (fixed dose, 10,000 Anti-Xa IU, OD). The median anticoagulation duration was 6.2 months. Six thrombotic events were observed (2.06%, 95% CI: 0.76-4.43%): 5 were DVT, and one PE. With respect to safety, 7 bleeding events occurred (2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0-5.3%); 6 of them were minor. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was safe and effective. Intermediate dose of tinzaparin seems to be an appropriate agent for cancer-associated thromboprophylaxis management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04248348.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xynogalos et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Active cancer with high thrombotic risk (n=291). Tinzaparin was evaluated on Thrombotic events (95% CI 0.76-4.43). Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate-dose tinzaparin in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was associated with a 2.06% rate of thrombotic events and a 2.6% rate of bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: