Key result
Thromboprophylaxis reduces VTE in high-risk cancer patients, but better biomarkers are needed for targeting.
Why the study?
Patients with cancer have a 4–6 times higher risk of thrombotic events, and current prophylactic anticoagulation strategies require individualized decision-making based on risk assessment scores.
Does prophylactic anticoagulation reduce the risk of thromboembolism in high-risk cancer patients?
Does prophylactic anticoagulation reduce the risk of thromboembolism in high-risk cancer patients?
This review highlights current guidelines recommending thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, fondaparinux, or DOACs for high-risk cancer patients, while emphasizing the need for better predictive biomarkers.
Supports guideline recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk cancer; leaves open refinement via superior predictive biomarkers.
Introduction: Patients with cancer are at risk of thrombotic events, mainly deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The thrombosis risk is generally 4–6 times higher than in a healthy population and depends on factors related to patient characteristics, tumor factors, and treatment-related factors. The decision-making for prophylactic anticoagulation is individualized according to the relative risks and benefits. The VTE risk has been quantified using different assessment scores.Areas covered: This article reviews current data and ongoing research on predictive factors involved in cancer-related thrombosis and highlights the currently suggested strategies for prophylaxis. Several trials that compared the two treatment options, direct factor Xa inhibitor or LMWH, with placebo and not each other are discussed. This article analyzed the safety and efficacy features that led several international organizations such as ASCO, NCCN, and others, to issue guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of patients at high risk of thrombosis by using LMWH, fondaparinux, and DOACs.Expert opinion: ASCO, NCCN, and other international organizations recommend thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients. However, further investigation is needed to define better biomarkers for more accurate identification of cancer patients that will benefit from anticoagulant treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadopoulos et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cancer-related thrombosis. Prophylactic anticoagulation (LMWH, fondaparinux, DOACs) was evaluated. Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, fondaparinux, or DOACs is recommended for high-risk cancer patients, though better biomarkers are needed to identify those who will benefit most.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: