Key result
Post-MI clinical trial participation linked to ~20% lower risk of recurrent ASCVD.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether post-myocardial infarction clinical trial participants are representative of the broader post-MI population regarding characteristics, secondary prevention, and prognosis.
Does participation in clinical trials reflect an unselected post-myocardial infarction population in terms of risk factors, socioeconomic status, and outcomes?
Cohort (n=31,792)
Yes
Does participation in clinical trials reflect an unselected post-myocardial infarction population in terms of risk factors, socioeconomic status, and outcomes?
Participants in post-myocardial infarction clinical trials are more often male, have higher socioeconomic status, a healthier risk profile, and better long-term prognosis than non-participants, highlighting significant external validity concerns.
Aims: To investigate whether participants in clinical trials after myocardial infarction (MI) are representable for the post-MI population concerning characteristics, secondary prevention, and prognosis. Methods and results: = 2941 clinical trial participants) between 2008 and 2013 identified in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART). Individual-level data on socioeconomic status (SES) (disposable income, educational level, and marital status) and outcomes (first recurrent non-fatal MI, coronary heart disease death, fatal or non-fatal stroke until study end 2018) were linked from other national registries. Trial participants were more likely to be men [risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.11], and married (1.07; 1.04-1.10), have a highest-quintile income (1.42; 1.36-1.48), and post-secondary education (1.25; 1.18-1.33), while less likely to have a history of MI (0.88; 0.80-0.97), be persistent smokers (0.83; 0.75-0.92) and have left ventricular dysfunction (0.59; 0.44-0.79) compared to non-participants. During a mean 6.7-year follow-up, 5206 outcome events occurred. Risk was lower in trial participants (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.89), also after adjusting for clinical characteristics and post-MI therapies (0.85; 0.77-0.94) and additionally for SES (0.88; 0.79-0.97). Conclusions: Clinical trial participants post-MI are more often male, have higher SES, a more advantageous risk profile, and better prognosis. Additional unmeasured participation bias was implied. Questionable external validity of post-MI trials highlights the importance of complementary studies using real-world data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohm et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Post-myocardial infarction (n=31,792). Participation in a clinical trial after myocardial infarction vs. Non-participation in a clinical trial was evaluated on First recurrent non-fatal MI, coronary heart disease death, or fatal or non-fatal ischaemic stroke (rASCVD) (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89). Participation in clinical trials after myocardial infarction was associated with a 20% lower risk of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to non-participation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: