PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1967Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior151 citationsOpen Access

Preference for Mixed‐ Versus Fixed‐ratio Schedules1

View Full Paper
EFEdmund Fantino

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Pigeons' pecks on one key produced a stimulus correlated with a mixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement. Pecks on a second key produced a stimulus correlated with a fixed-ratio schedule. When the arithmetic mean of the mixed ratios equaled the fixed ratio, the former stimulus maintained a higher rate of pecking. When the fixed ratio was sufficiently smaller, preference shifted to it. The pigeons' relative preference for the schedules could be described by comparing the geometric mean of the reinforcement rates in the several mixed-ratio components with the reinforcement rates in the fixed-ratio components.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Edmund Fantino (1967) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2291958a4701dbb7915989https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-35
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Some Data on the Discriminative Stimulus Hypothesis of Secondary Reinforcement1965 · 29 citations
  2. 2APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE11964 · 253 citations
  3. 3ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED‐RATIO REINFORCEMENT11964 · 131 citations
  4. 4Time-out from Positive Reinforcement1961 · 235 citations
  5. 5Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.1954 · 134 citations