Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four experiments examined differences in probabilistic reasoning as a function of whether problems were presented in a frequentist or case-specific form. The experiments demonstrated that these different forms influence the likelihood of Ss committing the conjunction and disjunction fallacies. The authors contend that these 2 forms elicit different approaches to probability. Frequency problems, it is argued, elicit a distributional approach in which probabilities are equated with relative frequencies, whereas case-specific problems elicit a singular approach in which probabilities are equated with the propensities or causal forces operating in an individual case
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reeves et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: