Key result
Endovascular stenting and subsequent overdilation in the rabbit aorta significantly decreased arterial wall compliance and distensibility compared to baseline (p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does stent overdilation change arterial wall mechanics in small-caliber arteries in a rabbit model?
Does stent overdilation change arterial wall mechanics in small-caliber arteries in a rabbit model?
Endovascular stenting and subsequent overdilation in a rabbit aorta model significantly decreases arterial wall compliance and distensibility.
Stent overdilation may reduce compliance in small arteries; leaves open translation to human clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in arterial wall mechanics induced by stent overdilation in the rabbit aorta. METHODS: Twenty New Zealand white rabbits had initial stent deployment (3-mm x 8-mm Multilink) at 10% overdilation. Group A (n=11) had no subsequent balloon expansion of the stent and Group B (n=9) had 30% overdilation of the stent. A noninvasive B-mode ultrasound examination coupled with image processing allowed the measurement of systolic and diastolic diameter and the calculation of diameter compliance (Cd) and distensibility coefficient (DC) as indexes of arterial wall biomechanics. Measurements were performed before stenting in the infrarenal aorta, after initial stenting, and after stent overdilation at 3 locations: upstream, at the stent level, and downstream from the stent. RESULTS: Cd was significantly lower in the stented aorta after initial stenting (p<0.0001) and after stent overdilation (p<0.0001) than before stenting. At the stent level, Cd and DC were significantly lower than downstream (p<0.0001) or upstream (p<0.0001) from the stent after initial stenting, as well as after stent overdilation. Downstream from the stent, Cd and DC were significantly lower after stent overdilation than before stenting (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stenting of the rabbit aorta produces a significant decrease in arterial wall compliance and distensibility. Stent overdilation is responsible for a slight additional decrease of compliance downstream from the stent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vernhet et al. (2002) studied Arterial wall mechanics (n=20). Stent overdilation (30%) vs. No subsequent balloon expansion (10% initial overdilation only) was evaluated on Diameter compliance (Cd) and distensibility coefficient (DC) (p=<0.0001). Endovascular stenting and subsequent overdilation in the rabbit aorta significantly decreased arterial wall compliance and distensibility compared to baseline (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: