Key result
Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia demonstrated good day-to-day reliability for peak leg blood flow (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) in young, healthy women.
Why the study?
Passive leg movement-elicited hyperaemia is an index of lower-limb microvascular function, but data on its reliability, particularly specific to women, were lacking.
Is passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia a reliable index of lower-limb microvascular function in young, healthy women?
Observational (n=17)
Is passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia a reliable index of lower-limb microvascular function in young, healthy women?
Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia is a reliable index of lower-limb microvascular function in young, healthy women, particularly when characterized by peak and Δpeak leg blood flow and vascular conductance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports passive leg movement hyperaemia reliability for microvascular research in young women; leaves open validation in patients and other groups.
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? This is the first study to assess the day-to-day reliability of passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia (PLM-H), an index of lower-limb microvascular function, in young, healthy women. What is the main finding and its importance? Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia demonstrated good day-to-day reliability, comparable to other common indices of endothelial function, supporting the use of PLM-H to assess lower-limb microvascular function in women. ABSTRACT: Passive leg movement-elicited hyperaemia (PLM-H) provides an index of lower-limb microvascular function. However, there is currently limited information regarding the reliability of PLM-H and no reliability information specific to women. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of PLM-H in women on two separate days. Seventeen young, healthy women [22 ± 3 years old (mean ± SD)] participated in two identical visits including three trials of PLM. Using duplex ultrasound, PLM-H was characterized by six indices: peak leg blood flow (LBF) and vascular conductance (LVC), peak change above baseline (Δpeak) for LBF and LVC, and area under the curve above baseline (AUC) during the first 60 s of PLM for LBF and LVC. The results demonstrated good day-to-day reliability of PLM-H characterized as peak LBF [r = 0.84, P < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.84; coefficient of variation (CV) = 13.2%], peak LVC (r = 0.82, P < 0.001; ICC = 0.79; CV = 14.4%), Δpeak LBF (r = 0.83, P < 0.001; ICC = 0.82; CV = 17.8%) and Δpeak LVC (r = 0.83, P < 0.001; ICC = 0.80; CV = 16.5%). Characterization of PLM as AUC demonstrated moderate day-to-day reliability: AUC LBF (r = 0.71, P < 0.05; ICC = 0.70; CV = 31.2%) and AUC LVC (r = 0.78, P < 0.001; ICC = 0.74; CV = 27.1%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that PLM-H has good reliability as an index of microvascular function; however, characterization of PLM-H as peak, Δpeak LBF and LVC is more reliable than AUC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lew et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=17). Passive leg movement (PLM) vs. Day 2 vs Day 1 (reliability) was evaluated on Day-to-day reliability of peak leg blood flow (LBF) (r = 0.84, p=<0.001). Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia demonstrated good day-to-day reliability for peak leg blood flow (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) in young, healthy women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: