Key result
The hyperemic response to upright seated passive leg movement was significantly correlated with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (r=0.57 for leg blood flow), supporting its construct validity as a noninvasive assessment of vascular health.
Why the study?
Does passive leg movement (PLM) correlate with flow-mediated dilation (FMD) for assessing vascular function in young and old subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
No
Does passive leg movement (PLM) correlate with flow-mediated dilation (FMD) for assessing vascular function in young and old subjects?
Effect estimate: r = 0.57
p-value: p=<0.05
Passive leg movement, particularly in the upright seated position, correlates significantly with flow-mediated dilation, suggesting it is a valid and easily implemented noninvasive assessment of vascular health.
Upright PLM may offer a practical vascular assessment alternative; cross-sectional correlations leave open its clinical adoption and outcome prediction.
The vasodilatory response to passive leg movement (PLM) appears to provide a novel, noninvasive assessment of vascular function. However, PLM has yet to be compared with the established noninvasive assessment of vascular health, flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Therefore, as an initial evaluation of the construct validity of PLM and upright seated and supine PLM as well as brachial (BA) and superficial femoral (SFA) artery FMDs were performed in 10 young (22 ± 1) and 30 old (73 ± 2) subjects. During upright seated PLM, the peak change in leg blood flow (ΔLBF) and leg vascular conductance (ΔLVC) was significantly correlated with BA (r = 0.57 and r = 0.66) and SFA (r = 0.44 and r = 0.41, ΔLBF and ΔLVC, respectively) FMD. Furthermore, although the relationships were not as strong, the supine PLM response was also significantly correlated with BA (r = 0.38 and r = 0.35) and SFA (r = 0.39 and r = 0.35, ΔLBF and ΔLVC, respectively) FMD. Examination of the young and old separately, however, revealed that significant relationships persisted in both groups only for the upright seated PLM response and BA FMD (young: r = 0.73 and r = 0.77; old: r = 0.35 and r = 0.45, ΔLBF and ΔLVC, respectively). Normalizing FMD for shear rate during PLM abrogated all significant relationships between the PLM and FMD response, suggesting a role for nitric oxide (NO) in these associations. Collectively, these data indicate that PLM, particularly upright seated PLM, likely provides an index of vascular health analogous to the traditional FMD test. Given the relative ease of PLM implementation, these data have important positive implications for PLM as a clinical vascular health assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossman et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=40). Passive leg movement (PLM) vs. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was evaluated on Correlation between peak change in leg blood flow during upright seated PLM and brachial artery FMD (r = 0.57, p=<0.05). The hyperemic response to upright seated passive leg movement was significantly correlated with brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (r=0.57 for leg blood flow), supporting its construct validity as a noninvasive assessment of vascular health.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: