Key result
Cooled-tip catheter shows no benefit over 8-mm tip for ablation time in long CTI.
Why the study?
Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) characteristics are rarely documented when comparing catheters for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial flutter. This study evaluated the impact of CTI morphology and length on ablation procedures and compared 8-mm-tip versus irrigated cooled-tip catheters in patients with a long CTI (>35 mm).
Does an irrigated cooled-tip catheter reduce radiofrequency application time or x-ray exposure compared to an 8-mm-tip catheter in patients with long cavotricuspid isthmus undergoing atrial flutter ablation?
RCT (n=185)
Randomized
Does an irrigated cooled-tip catheter reduce radiofrequency application time or x-ray exposure compared to an 8-mm-tip catheter in patients with long cavotricuspid isthmus undergoing atrial flutter ablation?
In patients with long cavotricuspid isthmus undergoing atrial flutter ablation, the choice between an 8-mm-tip and a cooled-tip catheter does not significantly influence radiofrequency application time or x-ray exposure, whereas isthmus length and morphology strongly dictate procedural parameters.
Either catheter is acceptable for long-CTI flutter ablation; confirms isthmus length and morphology—not tip design—drive RF applications and fluoroscopy.
BACKGROUND: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) characteristics are rarely documented when comparing catheters in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial flutter (AFL). Our objectives were (1) to evaluate the impact of CTI morphology and length on ablation procedures and (2) to compare the efficacy of an 8-mm-tip catheter with an irrigated cooled-tip RFA in the subgroup presumed to be more difficult to treat (with a long CTI, >35 mm). METHODS AND RESULTS: Over a period of 17 months, 185 patients accepted the protocol and underwent an isthmogram in preparation for RFA. Groups were classified according to CTI length and CTI morphology. RFA was performed with an 8-mm-tip catheter for patients with a short CTI, < or =35 mm (n=123), whereas randomization between an 8-mm-tip and a cooled-tip catheter applied to patients with a longer CTI, >35 mm (n=62). For long CTI, 32 patients were assigned to an 8-mm catheter and 30 patients to the cooled-tip RFA ablation group. In this subset, RF application (18.2+/-17 versus 19+/-13 minutes) and x-ray exposure (20.8+/-18 versus 18+/-13 minutes) did not differ between the 8-mm-tip and the cooled-tip procedures. Number of applications (9.9+/-11 versus 18.6+/-15 minutes; P<0.0001) and x-ray exposure (11.7+/-11 versus 19.5+/-16 minutes, P=0.0001) differed significantly between patients with short and long CTIs. Patients with short and straight CTIs required 3 times fewer RFA applications and shorter x-ray exposure compared with other CTI morphologies (pouch-like recesses and concave characteristics). CONCLUSIONS: The number of RF applications required for a complete isthmus block in long CTIs is not influenced by the choice between an 8-mm or cooled-tip catheter. Procedure parameters, however, are significantly influenced by CTI length and morphology. Pouch-like recesses and concave characteristics account for much longer ablation times at all CTI lengths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Atrial flutter (n=185). 8-mm-tip catheter vs. Irrigated cooled-tip catheter was evaluated on Radiofrequency application time. In patients with a long cavotricuspid isthmus (>35 mm), radiofrequency application time did not differ between an 8-mm-tip and a cooled-tip catheter (18.2±17 vs 19±13 minutes).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: