Key result
Ventricular excitation (QRS) was significantly more nondipolar than recovery (ST-T), with overall nondipolarity of QRS exceeding that of ST-T by 41% (P < .005).
Ventricular recovery (ST-T) generates electrical fields that are notably more dipolar than those caused by depolarization (QRS) in isolated rabbit hearts.
We studied the relative dipolar and nondipolar content of signal energy throughout ventricular excitation and recovery in 34 isolated, perfused rabbit hearts, suspended in an electrolyte-filled spherical chamber. Computer-processed signals were derived from 20 evenly spaced tank-surface electrodes, and a single, moving, equivalent cardiac dipole generator was optimally fitted to the recorded potentials for each 1-msec sampling interval. Superimposed, time-based plots of signal energy for the 34 preparations showed ventricular excitation to be strikingly more nondipolar than was recovery. In terms of the summed square ratio of nondipolar residual energies, overall nondipolarity of QRS exceed that of ST-T by 41%. Furthermore, the maximum instantaneous ratio during QRS was considerably greater than during the ST-T. Evaluation of paired differences, comparing nondipolar behavior throughout QRS with all of ST-T, proved highly significant (P less than .005). We also found that in contrast to the considerable mobility exhibited by the equivalent QRS dipole, the ST-T dipole locus remained nearly stationary during most of ventricular recovery. Presumably because repolarization is temporally and spatially a relatively diffuse process, it may generate electrical fields which are notably more dipolar than those caused by depolarization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brody et al. (1977) studied this question. Ventricular excitation (QRS) vs. Ventricular recovery (ST-T) was evaluated on Relative dipolar and nondipolar content of signal energy (p=<.005). Ventricular excitation (QRS) was significantly more nondipolar than recovery (ST-T), with overall nondipolarity of QRS exceeding that of ST-T by 41% (P < .005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Circulation Research