Key result
Nondipolar body surface potential content peaks during initial and late QRS phases versus ST-T.
Why the study?
The dipolarity and locus of the main dipole during QRS and T waves in normal men were not quantitatively characterized at high temporal resolution.
Observational (n=27)
Ventricular repolarization is more accurately approximated by a single fixed dipole than ventricular depolarization, which displays significantly higher nondipolar content.
Greater nondipolar QRS content in normals reinforces single-dipole repolarization models; leaves diagnostic utility in disease open.
The dipolarity of the body surface potential distribution and the locus of the main dipole were estimated mathematically at 2 msec intervals in 27 normal men. The nondipolar content showed time-dependent fluctuation during the QRS. It increased sharply at early and later phases of the QRS. The main dipole moved smoothly within the actual cardiac region and was inscribed in a clockwise direction in most cases. The nondipolar content during the ST-T period was smaller and with less fluctuation than that during the QRS. The main dipole during the T wave moved less than 2 cm near the center of the heart. These results indicated that although a fairly large percentage of the body surface potential could be represented by a single moving dipole, the nondipolar content was larger during initial and late phases of the QRS. It was also suggested that the ventricular repolarization process can be better approximated by a single fixed dipole in normal men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsunakawa et al. (1985) conducted an observational in Healthy adult males (n=27). Body surface potential mapping was evaluated on Dipolarity (nondipolar content or residue) and dipole location during QRS and T waves. The nondipolar content of body surface potentials was larger and showed more time-dependent fluctuation during the initial and late phases of QRS than during the ST-T period in normal men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Japanese Heart Journal