Key result
First-trimester pregnant patients with abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry had higher estimated left ventricular filling pressure (P=0.004) compared to those with normal velocimetry.
Why the study?
Does abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the first trimester associate with impaired maternal cardiac function or elevated cardiac biomarkers?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Does abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the first trimester associate with impaired maternal cardiac function or elevated cardiac biomarkers?
First-trimester pregnancies with abnormal uterine artery resistance exhibit echocardiographic signs of higher left ventricular filling pressure and potential systolic dysfunction, without significant elevations in cTnT or NT-proBNP.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal cardiac function and serum concentration of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in first-trimester patients, according to uterine artery Doppler velocimetry (UADV). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included singleton pregnancies with normal UADV (n=17) and abnormal UADV (n=19). Maternal echocardiography was performed and blood samples were taken at 11-14 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters included: (a) left ventricular (LV) long axis velocities; (b) atrial size; (c) LV filling pressure; (d) the ratio of peak mitral flow velocity in early diastole and early mitral annular diastolic velocity (E/Ea ratio); and (e) the E/flow propagation velocity ratio. The maternal serum concentrations of cTnT and NT-proBNP were determined by sensitive and specific immunoassays. RESULTS: Patients with abnormal UADV had higher estimated left ventricular filling pressure (P=0.004), higher E/Ea ratio (P=0.03), higher E/flow propagation ratio (P=0.02), and lower LV long axis velocity (P=0.02) than those with normal UADV. There were no significant differences in the maternal serum concentration of cTnT or NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal UADV in the first trimester have higher left ventricular filling pressure and may have left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prefumo et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Pregnancy (n=36). Abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry vs. Normal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry was evaluated on Maternal cardiac function and serum concentrations of cTnT and NT-proBNP (p=<0.05). First-trimester pregnant patients with abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry had higher estimated left ventricular filling pressure (P=0.004) compared to those with normal velocimetry.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: