Key result
The adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) method achieved the highest average accuracy (99.34%) for detecting fetal heart sounds across 12 types and levels of interference compared to EMD and EEMD.
Why the study?
Fetal phonocardiography is often disturbed by a wide range of artifacts that hinder extraction of diagnostic information, necessitating effective signal filtering methods.
Does adaptive wavelet transform improve the accuracy of fetal heart sound detection in noisy fetal phonocardiography signals compared to EMD and EEMD?
Does adaptive wavelet transform improve the accuracy of fetal heart sound detection in noisy fetal phonocardiography signals compared to EMD and EEMD?
Absolute Event Rate: 99.34% vs 88.73%
Adaptive wavelet transform outperforms empirical mode decomposition methods in filtering noise from fetal phonocardiography signals, enabling highly accurate fetal heart rate detection.
May aid fetal phonocardiography denoising in noise; leaves open clinical validation before monitoring adoption.
Fetal phonocardiography (fPCG) is a non-invasive technique for detection of fetal heart sounds (fHSs), murmurs and vibrations. This acoustic recording is passive and provides an alternative low-cost method to ultrasonographic cardiotocography (CTG). Unfortunately, the fPCG signal is often disturbed by the wide range of artifacts that make it difficult to obtain significant diagnostic information from this signal. The study focuses on the filtering of an fPCG signal containing three types of noise (ambient noise, Gaussian noise, and movement artifacts of the mother and the fetus) having different amplitudes. Three advanced signal processing methods: empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), and adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) were tested and compared. The evaluation of the extraction was performed by determining the accuracy of S1 sounds detection and by determining the fetal heart rate (fHR). The evaluation of the effectiveness of the method was performed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean error of heart interval measurement (|ΔT i | ), and the statistical parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). Using the EMD method, ACC > 95$ % was achieved in 7 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 88.73 %, SE = 91.57 %, PPV = 94.80 % and $F1 = 93.12$ %. Using the EEMD method, ACC > 95$ % was achieved in 9 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 97.49 %, SE = 97.89 %, PV = 99.53 % and F1 = 98.69 %. In this study, the best results were achieved using the AWT method, which provided ACC > 95 % in all 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 99.34 %, SE = 99.49 %, PPV = 99.85 % a F1 = 99.67 %.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínek et al. (2020) studied Fetal heart sounds detection. Adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) vs. Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) was evaluated on Accuracy of S1 sounds detection. The adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) method achieved the highest average accuracy (99.34%) for detecting fetal heart sounds across 12 types and levels of interference compared to EMD and EEMD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: