Key result
Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist reduced surgical site infections (13.6% vs 29.2%, P<0.05) and major wound disruptions (5.2% vs 10.8%, P<0.05) compared to pre-implementation.
Why the study?
Complications related to healthcare constitute an important public health problem, and implementing checklists in medicine and surgery can decrease adverse event risks and improve patient safety.
Does the implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery?
Observational (n=500)
Does the implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.6% vs 29.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist significantly reduces postoperative complications including surgical site infections, major wound disruptions, and sepsis.
May support checklist use in similar cohorts; hypothesis-generating, leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background: Safe Surgery Saves Lives. Patient safety is a fundamental of good quality health care, and complications due to the health-care system are well-documented and constitute an important public health problem. Implementation of the checklist in medicine and surgery can help to decrease the risk of adverse events thus can improve patient safety. Materials and Methods: After the Institutional Ethical Committee clearance, a total of 500 patients were enrolled and divided into two equal groups. In Group 1 (n = 250), patients underwent surgery before regular implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC), whereas in Group 2 (n = 250), patients underwent surgery after the WHO SSC was regularly implemented. All the patients were followed up after the surgery, and patients were looked for and compared for the postoperative complications. Results: We found that 27 patients (10.8%) in Group 1 and 13 patients (5.2%) in Group 2 developed major wound disruption (P < 0.05). There were 73 patients (29.2%) in Group 1 and 34 patients (13.6%) in the Group 2 who developed an infection of the surgical site (P < 0.05). There were five patients (2%) in Group 1 while none of the patients in Group 2 developed sepsis during the study (P < 0.05). Conclusions: We found that implementation of the WHO SSC significantly reduces surgical site infections, major disruptions of the wound, and sepsis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Surgery (n=500). WHO surgical safety checklist (SSC) vs. Before regular implementation of the WHO SSC was evaluated on infection of the surgical site (p=<0.05). Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist reduced surgical site infections (13.6% vs 29.2%, P<0.05) and major wound disruptions (5.2% vs 10.8%, P<0.05) compared to pre-implementation.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: