Key result
Nurse-led Supportive CTraC linked to ~61% higher hospice enrollment vs controls in seriously ill veterans.
Why the study?
The study aimed to implement and evaluate an adapted version of CTraC, Supportive CTraC, to improve the quality of transitional and end-of-life care for veterans with serious illness.
Does a nurse-led supportive Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program improve end-of-life outcomes and hospice enrollment in veterans with serious illness?
Cohort (n=208)
No
Does a nurse-led supportive Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program improve end-of-life outcomes and hospice enrollment in veterans with serious illness?
Hazard Ratio: 1.61 (95% CI 1.07–2.43)
Absolute Event Rate: 54.8% vs 37.5%
A nurse-driven transitional care program significantly increased hospice enrollment and decreased ICU admissions for veterans with serious illness.
May support nurse-led models in veteran palliative care; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND: The Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program is a telephone-based, nurse-driven program shown to decrease readmissions. The aim of this project was to implement and evaluate an adapted version of CTraC, Supportive CTraC, to improve the quality of transitional and end-of-life care for veterans with serious illness. METHODS: We used the Replicating Effective Programs framework to guide adaptation and implementation. An RN nurse case manager (NCM) with experience in geriatrics and palliative care worked closely with inpatient and outpatient care teams to coordinate care. Eligible patients had a life-limiting diagnosis with substantial functional impairment and were not enrolled in hospice. The NCM identified veterans at VA Boston Healthcare System during an acute admission and delivered a protocolized intervention to define care needs and preferences, align care with patient values, optimize discharge plans, and provide ongoing, intensive phone-based case management. To evaluate efficacy, we matched each Supportive CTraC enrollee 1:1 to a contemporary comparison subject by age, risk of death or hospitalization, and discharge diagnosis. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-Proportional Hazards models to evaluate outcomes. Outcomes included palliative and hospice care use, acute care use, Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment documentation, and survival. RESULTS: The NCM enrolled 104 veterans with high protocol fidelity. Over 1.5 years of follow-up, Supportive CTraC enrollees were 61% more likely to enroll in hospice than the comparison group (n = 57 vs. 39; HR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.07-2.43). While overall acute care use was similar between groups, Supportive CTraC patients had fewer ICU admissions (n = 36 vs. 53; p = 0.005), were more likely to die in hospice (53 vs. 34; p = 0.008), and twice as likely to die at home with hospice (32.0 vs. 15.5; p = 0.02). There was no difference in survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-driven transitional care program for veterans with serious illness is feasible and effective at improving end-of-life outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madrigal et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Serious illness (n=208). Supportive Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program vs. Matched contemporary comparison subjects was evaluated on Hospice enrollment (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.43). The nurse-led Supportive CTraC program increased hospice enrollment among veterans with serious illness compared to matched controls (54.8% vs 37.5%; HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: