Key result
Glucagon exerts no inotropic or chronotropic effects in human hearts lacking detectable receptors.
Why the study?
Glucagon is thought to increase heart rate and contractility via glucagon receptors and cAMP production in animal studies, but this has not been confirmed in the human heart.
Does glucagon exert inotropic and chronotropic effects and are glucagon receptors expressed in the human heart?
Does glucagon exert inotropic and chronotropic effects and are glucagon receptors expressed in the human heart?
Glucagon does not exert inotropic or chronotropic effects on the human heart due to a lack of glucagon receptor expression, challenging previous assumptions based on animal models.
Glucagon lacks direct cardiac effects in humans; challenges animal model assumptions and leaves open alternative HF mechanisms.
Background Glucagon is thought to increase heart rate and contractility by stimulating glucagon receptors and increasing 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production in the myocardium. This has been confirmed in animal studies but not in the human heart. The cardiostimulatory effects of glucagon have been correlated with the degree of cardiac dysfunction, as well as with the enzymatic activity of phosphodiesterase (PDE), which hydrolyses cAMP. In this study, the presence of glucagon receptors in the human heart and the inotropic and chronotropic effects of glucagon in samples of failing and nonfailing (NF) human hearts were investigated. Methods Concentration‒response curves for glucagon in the absence and presence of the PDE inhibitor IBMX were performed on samples obtained from the right (RA) and left atria (LA), the right (RV) and left ventricles (LV), and the sinoatrial nodes (SNs) of failing and NF human hearts. The expression of glucagon receptors was also investigated. Furthermore, the inotropic and chronotropic effects of glucagon were examined in rat hearts. Results In tissues obtained from failing and NF human hearts, glucagon did not exert inotropic or chronotropic effects in the absence or presence of IBMX. IBMX (30 µM) induced a marked increase in contractility in NF hearts (RA: 83 ± 28% (n = 5), LA: 80 ± 20% (n = 5), RV: 75 ± 12% (n = 5), and LV: 40 ± 8% (n = 5), weaker inotropic responses in the ventricular myocardium of failing hearts (RV: 25 ± 10% (n = 5) and LV: 10 ± 5% (n = 5) and no inotropic responses in the atrial myocardium of failing hearts. IBMX (30 µM) increased the SN rate in failing and NF human hearts (27.4 ± 3.0 beats min −1 , n = 10). In rat hearts, glucagon induced contractile and chronotropic responses, but only contractility was enhanced by 30 µM IBMX (maximal inotropic effect of glucagon 40 ± 8% vs. 75 ± 10%, in the absence or presence of IBMX, n = 5, P < 0.05; maximal chronotropic response 77.7 ± 6.4 beats min −1 vs. 73 ± 11 beats min −1 , in the absence or presence of IBMX, n = 5, P > 0.05). Glucagon receptors were not detected in the human heart samples. Conclusions Our results conflict with the view that glucagon induces inotropic and chronotropic effects and that glucagon receptors are expressed in the human heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aranda et al. (2023) studied Heart failure (n=10). Glucagon vs. Baseline was evaluated on Inotropic and chronotropic effects in human heart tissue. Glucagon did not exert inotropic or chronotropic effects in failing or nonfailing human heart tissues, and glucagon receptors were not detected in the human heart.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: