Key result
Systematic echocardiography alongside ECG for athlete screening identified no additional cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in isolation, whereas an ECG-led protocol reduced total costs by 47%.
Why the study?
Does systematic echocardiography alongside ECG improve the identification of sudden cardiac death disease and cost-effectiveness in athletes undergoing pre-participation screening?
Population
1,628 ethnically diverse athletes in West Asia undergoing pre-participation screening
Comparison
Systematic echocardiography alongside 12-lead… vs ECG-led screening programme with ECHO reserved…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
ECG-led screening may suffice without missing isolated HCM; leaves open prospective trials to confirm safety and cost savings.
Observational (n=1,628)
Does systematic echocardiography alongside ECG improve the identification of sudden cardiac death disease and cost-effectiveness in athletes undergoing pre-participation screening?
Systematic echocardiography during pre-participation screening in athletes does not increase the diagnostic yield for sudden cardiac death-associated diseases over an ECG-led approach and significantly increases costs.
Riding et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Pre-participation screening in athletes (n=1,628). Systematic echocardiography (ECHO) alongside ECG vs. ECG-led programme (ECHO reserved as follow-up) was evaluated on Identification of sudden cardiac death (SCD) disease and cost per diagnosis. Systematic echocardiography alongside ECG for athlete screening identified no additional cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in isolation, whereas an ECG-led protocol reduced total costs by 47%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: