Key result
ACEi/ARB therapy in ICD recipients with prior VT/VF was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapies in propensity-matched analysis (HR 0.380; 95% CI 0.193-0.747; P=0.005).
Why the study?
The prognostic impact of ACEi or ARB treatment on recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients was not well established.
Does ACEi/ARB therapy reduce the recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies in ICD recipients with documented VT or VF?
Cohort (n=592)
Does ACEi/ARB therapy reduce the recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies in ICD recipients with documented VT or VF?
ACEi/ARB therapy is associated with a significant reduction in appropriate ICD therapies among patients with a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
May support ACEi/ARB to reduce ICD therapies in VT/VF; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Using a large retrospective registry including consecutive ICD recipients with documented episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016, those patients treated with ACEi/ARB were compared with patients without. The primary prognostic endpoint was the first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies at 5 years. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied within the entire cohort, and thereafter, Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed in propensity-matched subgroups. A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients were included (81% treated with ACEi/ARB and 19% without). Although ACEi/ARB was associated with no differences in overall recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ACEi/ARB was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapy within multivariable Cox regressions (hazard ratio = 0.666; P = 0.043), especially in patients with index episodes of VF, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, coronary artery disease, secondary preventive ICD, and glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m. In the propensity-matched subgroup, ACEi/ARB still prolonged freedom from appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio = 0.380; 95% confidence interval 0.193-0.747; P = 0.005). In conclusion, ACEi/ARB therapy was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schupp et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients with documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (n=592). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) vs. No ACEi/ARB treatment was evaluated on First recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies at 5 years (HR 0.380, 95% CI 0.193-0.747, p=0.005). ACEi/ARB therapy in ICD recipients with prior VT/VF was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapies in propensity-matched analysis (HR 0.380; 95% CI 0.193-0.747; P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: