PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2005Applied and Environmental Microbiology599 citationsOpen Access

Persistence and Differential Survival of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Subtropical Waters and Sediments

View Full Paper
KAKimberly L. AndersonJWJohn E. WhitlockVHValerie J. Harwood

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Fecal coliforms and enterococci are indicator organisms used worldwide to monitor water quality. These bacteria are used in microbial source tracking (MST) studies, which attempt to assess the contribution of various host species to fecal pollution in water. Ideally, all strains of a given indicator organism (IO) would experience equal persistence (maintenance of culturable populations) in water; however, some strains may have comparatively extended persistence outside the host, while others may persist very poorly in environmental waters. Assessment of the relative contribution of host species to fecal pollution would be confounded by differential persistence of strains. Here, freshwater and saltwater mesocosms, including sediments, were inoculated with dog feces, sewage, or contaminated soil and were incubated under conditions that included natural stressors such as microbial predators, radiation, and temperature fluctuations. Persistence of IOs was measured by decay rates (change in culturable counts over time). Decay rates were influenced by IO, inoculum, water type, sediment versus water column location, and Escherichia coli strain. Fecal coliform decay rates were significantly lower than those of enterococci in freshwater but were not significantly different in saltwater. IO persistence according to mesocosm treatment followed the trend: contaminated soil > wastewater > dog feces. E. coli ribotyping demonstrated that certain strains were more persistent than others in freshwater mesocosms, and the distribution of ribotypes sampled from mesocosm waters was dissimilar from the distribution in fecal material. These results have implications for the accuracy of MST methods, modeling of microbial populations in water, and efficacy of regulatory standards for protection of water quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anderson et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22c666f1a51c21f70e1a55https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.6.3041-3048.2005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: Efficacy in the California collaborative study2003 · 106 citations
  2. 2AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION1910 · 4,322 citations
  3. 3The evaluation and comparison of ion chromatography, segmented flow analysis and flow injection analysis for the determination on nitrate in natural surface waters1989 · 16 citations
  4. 4Removal and recovery of lead fixed-bed biosorption with immobilized bacterial biomass1998 · 35 citations
  5. 5Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water2003 · 88 citations