PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Social Sciences & Humanities Open0 citationsOpen Access

Eco-social cost unit and corporate sustainability: Evidence from the global oil and gas industry

View Full Paper
YPYobi Nagoya PratiwiDSDoddy SetiawanFFalikhatun

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the influence of Eco-Social Cost Unit Carbon on corporate sustainability performance and the role of media attention in this relationship.
  • Utilized a global panel of publicly listed oil and gas companies
  • Applied panel regression models to analyze the data
  • Examined the moderating effect of media attention on the relationship between ESCU Carbon and ESG scores.
  • ESCU Carbon is positively associated with ESG performance (p<0.05)
  • Media attention enhances the relationship, increasing stakeholder awareness
  • Findings remain consistent across various model specifications and endogeneity tests.

Abstract

The sustainability performance of oil and gas companies is increasingly shaped not only by operational efficiency but also by their ability to internalize carbon externalities. This study examines whether Eco-Social Cost Unit (ESCU) Carbon influences corporate sustainability performance, measured using ESG scores, and whether media attention moderates this relationship. Using a global panel of publicly listed oil and gas companies and panel regression models, the results show that ESCU Carbon is positively associated with ESG performance. This finding suggests that the monetization of carbon externalities is interpreted by stakeholders as a signal of environmental governance and corporate accountability rather than merely an indicator of environmental burden. Media attention strengthens this relationship in baseline estimations by increasing the visibility of carbon internalization practices. These findings remain robust across alternative model specifications and endogeneity tests. Theoretically, this study extends signaling and stakeholder perspectives by demonstrating that monetized environmental externalities function as governance signals within ESG evaluation frameworks. Practically, the results highlight that transparent carbon cost internalization can strengthen sustainability credibility and provide investors and ESG evaluators with clearer signals of corporate climate governance in carbon-intensive industries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pratiwi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22ca80b6d4a6e1724c9768https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A pathway towards corporate sustainability: Does media attention matter?2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Carbon pricing and the food system: Implications for sustainability and equity2024 · 21 citations
  3. 3Does stakeholder and media attention influence climate change disclosure? Evidence from mining industry2025 · 21 citations
  4. 4Media attention and regulatory efficiency of corporate violations: Evidence from China2021 · 71 citations
  5. 5Investing in Carbon Credits2023 · 6 citations