Key result
Croatian Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test demonstrates excellent validity and reliability.
Why the study?
Understanding and preventing pressure ulcers is essential to healthcare, but a validated Croatian instrument to evaluate healthcare professionals' knowledge was needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=268)
No
The translated and culturally adapted Croatian version of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing healthcare professionals' knowledge.
Supports reliable pressure ulcer knowledge assessment in Croatia; leaves open prospective validation of clinical impact.
Background: Understanding and preventing pressure ulcers is a key aspect of healthcare, with nurses playing a crucial role in their management and prevention through education and clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. Objectives: This quantitative, psychometric, cross-sectional study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Pieper–Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Croatian version of this measurement instrument. Methods: A study was conducted in a state hospital in Šibenik, Croatia, on a sample of 268 participants. Results: The content validity of the instrument, with an S-CVI of 0.981, indicates excellent validity, while its internal consistency is acceptable, as reflected in an overall KR-20 of 0.79. The maximum split-half reliability is 0.87 and Guttman Lambda 6 reaches 0.89, indicating excellent internal consistency. The overall test–retest reliability is excellent (ICC = 0.91), with the Prevention subscale showing the highest reliability (ICC = 0.88), followed by Staging (ICC = 0.86) and Wound Description (ICC = 0.84). Item-level difficulty and discrimination index were also calculated. Conclusions: The adapted, translated, and validated questionnaire represents a valuable tool for measuring knowledge about pressure ulcers among healthcare professionals, suitable for use in Croatian society. This instrument can be used to assess knowledge in clinical settings and evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs, providing valuable insights into the education and professional competence development of healthcare professionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puzić et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Pressure ulcer knowledge (n=268). Croatian version of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test was evaluated on Psychometric properties (content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability). The Croatian version of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI 0.981), internal consistency (KR-20 0.79), and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: