Comparative bioinformatic analysis reveals differences in iron and sulfur management in diverse archaea, suggesting ecological implications.
Archaeal methanogens, methanotrophs, and alkanotrophs, argued to be among the most ancient forms of life, have a high demand for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) for cofactor biosynthesis, among other uses. Here, using comparative bioinformatic approaches applied to 326 genomes, we show that major differences in Fe/S acquisition, trafficking, deployment, and storage exist in this group. Variation in these characters was generally congruent with the phylogenetic placement of these genomes, indicating that variation in Fe/S usage and deployment has contributed to the diversification and ecology of these organisms. However, incongruency was observed among the distribution of cofactor biosynthesis pathways and known protein destinations for those cofactors, suggesting auxotrophy or yet-to-be-discovered pathways for cofactor biosynthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: