General purpose hybrid dataflow/von-Neumann architectures are gaining attraction as effective parallel platforms. Although different implementations differ in the way they merge the conceptually different computational models, they all follow similar principles: they harness the parallelism and data synchronization inherent to the dataflow model, yet maintain the programmability of the von-Neumann model. In this paper, we classify hybrid dataflow/von-Neumann models according to two different taxonomies: one based on the execution model used for inter- and intrablock execution, and the other based on the integration level of both control and dataflow execution models. The paper reviews the basic concepts of von-Neumann and dataflow computing models, highlights their inherent advantages and limitations, and motivates the exploration of a synergistic hybrid computing model. Finally, we compare a representative set of recent general purpose hybrid dataflow/von-Neumann architectures, discuss their different approaches, and explore the evolution of these hybrid processors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yazdanpanah et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: