The size of deep learning models has been increasing to enhance model quality. The linear increase in training computation budgets with model size means that training an extremely large-scale model is exceedingly time-consuming. Recently, the Mixture of Experts (MoE) has drawn significant attention as it can scale models to extra-large sizes with a near-stable computation budget. However, inefficient distributed training of large-scale MoE models hinders their broader application. Specifically, a considerable dynamic load imbalance occurs among devices during training, significantly reducing throughput. Several load-balancing works have been proposed to address the challenge. System-level solutions draw more attention for their hardware affinity and non-disruption of model convergence compared to algorithm-level ones. However, they are troubled by high communication costs and poor communication-computation overlap. To address these challenges, we propose a systematic load-balancing method, Pro-Prophet, which consists of a planner and a scheduler for efficient parallel training of large-scale MoE models. To adapt to the dynamic load imbalance, we have profiled training statistics and utilized them to design Pro-Prophet. For lower communication volume, the Pro-Prophet planner determines a series of lightweight load-balancing strategies and efficiently searches for a communication-efficient one for training based on the statistics. For sufficient overlapping of communication and computation, the Pro-Prophet scheduler schedules the data-dependent operations based on the statistics and operation characteristics, further improving the training throughput. We conduct extensive experiments in various clusters and MoE models. The results indicate that Pro-Prophet achieves up to 2.66x speedup on MoE-GPT models compared to two popular MoE frameworks, namely Deepspeed-MoE and FasterMoE. Furthermore, Pro-Prophet has demonstrated a load-balancing improvement of up to 11.01x and speedups on modern MoE models up to 1.22x compared to a representative load-balancing work, FasterMoE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: