Why the study?
Published brain MRE values vary largely and lack detail resolution, prompting the introduction of 2D and 3D cerebral tomoelastography to improve consistency and detail resolution.
Does 2D vs 3D cerebral tomoelastography provide better consistency and detail resolution in healthy volunteers?
Does 2D vs 3D cerebral tomoelastography provide better consistency and detail resolution in healthy volunteers?
2D cerebral tomoelastography shows less variation across volunteers in shorter scan times than 3D-MRE, while 3D-MRE is more sensitive to subtle biological effects such as aging.
2D-MRE offers greater short-term reproducibility for cerebral stiffness in volunteers; leaves open whether 3D-MRE better detects subtle aging effects clinically.
Purpose: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) generates quantitative maps of the mechanical properties of biological soft tissues. However, published values obtained by brain MRE vary largely and lack detail resolution, due to either true biological effects or technical challenges. We here introduce cerebral tomoelastography in two and three dimensions for improved data consistency and detail resolution while considering aging, brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI). Methods: Multifrequency MRE with 2D- and 3D-tomoelastography postprocessing was applied to the brains of 31 volunteers (age range: 22—61 years) for analyzing the coefficient of variation (CV) and effects of biological factors. Eleven volunteers were rescanned after 1 day and 1 year to determine intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and identify possible long-term changes. Results: White matter shear wave speed (SWS) was slightly higher in 2D-MRE (1.28 ± 0.02 m/s) than 3D-MRE (1.22 ± 0.05 m/s, p < 0.0001), with less variation after 1 day in 2D (0.33 ± 0.32%) than in 3D (0.96 ± 0.66%, p = 0.004), which was also reflected in a slightly lower CV and higher ICC in 2D (1.84%, 0.97 [0.88–0.99]) than in 3D (3.89%, 0.95 [0.76–0.99]). Remarkably, 3D-MRE was sensitive to a decrease in white matter SWS within only 1 year, whereas no change in white matter volume was observed during this follow-up period. Across volunteers, stiffness correlated with age and BPF, but not with blood pressure and BMI. Conclusion: Cerebral tomoelastography provides high-resolution viscoelasticity maps with excellent consistency. Brain MRE in 2D shows less variation across volunteers in shorter scan times than 3D-MRE, while 3D-MRE appears to be more sensitive to subtle biological effects such as aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herthum et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: