Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As government policy settings have become more to aspirations of Indigenous communities and are more sensitive to the concerns of Indigenous communities, the research environment has become more conducive to understanding the cultural implications of genomic research. CELSI-us is a tongue-in-cheek reference to taking the temperature of the relationship between genomic researchers and Indigenous communities. If we create friction, then the temperature rises. But if we engage in a culturally responsive manner, then we take the heat out of the relationship and can focus on achieving mutually beneficial outcomes. This has been the focus of our work to date, and we hope that the guidelines we have produced make this challenging path easier for others to traverse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudson et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: