Key result
Enoxaparin significantly reduced the combined end point of death or nonfatal MI at 30 days compared to unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation ACS (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99).
Why the study?
Does enoxaparin reduce the combined end point of death or nonfatal MI compared to unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes?
Population
21,946 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes pooled from 6 randomized controlled…
Comparison
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated heparin
Design
Meta-analysis
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Supports enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin in NSTE-ACS; confirms composite benefit without excess bleeding across 6 RCTs.
Meta-Analysis (n=21,946)
Yes
Does enoxaparin reduce the combined end point of death or nonfatal MI compared to unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes?
Odds Ratio: 0.91 (95% CI 0.83–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.1% vs 11%
Number Needed to Treat: 107
In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing the composite of death or nonfatal MI without significantly increasing major bleeding.
Petersen et al. (2004) conducted a meta-analysis in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (n=21,946). Enoxaparin vs. Unfractionated heparin was evaluated on death or nonfatal MI at 30 days (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99). Enoxaparin significantly reduced the combined end point of death or nonfatal MI at 30 days compared to unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment elevation ACS (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: