The authors verify the validity of applying state-space averaging and linearization to the control law of current-injected switching regulators for designs with wideband first-order open-loop responses without right-hand plane (RHP) zeros. Quantitative closed-loop performance comparisons are made of current-injected versus voltage control for the boost and buck switching regulator topologies. In buck-topology regulators, current-injected control implemented using pole cancellation, does not yield categorically better closed-loop performance than what is obtained by using lead compensated voltage control. For the boost regulator, the advantages of current-injected control are greater since lead-compensation cannot usually be used due to the duty-factor-dependent complex pole and RHP zero.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoneman et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: