Key result
AI demonstrates ~89% agreement with cardiologists in detecting and grading CAC on non-gated chest CTs.
Why the study?
Non-gated, non-contrast CT scans ordered for non-cardiac indications do not routinely report coronary artery calcium, but artificial intelligence algorithms may help detect and quantify it.
Does an AI algorithm accurately detect and semi-quantitate coronary artery calcium on non-gated, non-contrast CT scans obtained for non-cardiac indications?
Observational (n=527)
None
No
Does an AI algorithm accurately detect and semi-quantitate coronary artery calcium on non-gated, non-contrast CT scans obtained for non-cardiac indications?
AI can accurately detect and semi-quantitate coronary artery calcium on routine non-gated, non-contrast chest CTs, identifying a significant proportion of patients with previously undiagnosed ASCVD who may benefit from preventive therapies.
Supports AI-assisted CAC scoring on routine CTs; leaves open whether it improves preventive care or outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Non-gated, non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly ordered for a variety of non-cardiac indications, but do not routinely comment on the presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC)/atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) which is known to correlate with increased cardiovascular risk. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can help detect and quantify CAC/ASCVD which can lead to early treatment and improved outcomes. METHODS: Using an FDA-approved algorithm (NANOX AI) to measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) on non-gated, non-contrast CT chest, 536 serial scans were evaluated in this single-center retrospective study. Scans were categorized by Agatston scores as normal-mild (<100), moderate (100-399), or severe (≥400). AI results were validated by cardiologist's overread. Patient charts were retrospectively analyzed for clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 527 patients included in this analysis, a total of 258 (48.96%) had moderate-severe disease; of these, 164 patients (63.57%, p< 0.001) had no previous diagnosis of CAD. Of those with moderate-severe disease 135 of 258 (52.33% p=0.006) were not on aspirin and 96 (37.21% p=0.093) were not on statin therapy. Cardiologist interpretation demonstrated 88.76% agreement with AI classification. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Machine learning utilized in CT scans obtained for non-cardiac indications can detect and semi-quantitate CAC accurately. Artificial intelligence algorithms can accurately be applied to non-gated, non-contrast CT scans to identify CAC/ASCVD allowing for early medical intervention and improved clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerndt et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary artery calcium (CAC) (n=527). Artificial intelligence algorithm (NANOX AI) vs. Cardiologist interpretation was evaluated on Agreement between AI classification and cardiologist interpretation for CAC severity. An artificial intelligence algorithm demonstrated 88.76% agreement with cardiologist interpretation in detecting and semi-quantitating coronary artery calcium on non-gated, non-contrast chest CT scans.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: