Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: The retention of Clinical Research Associates (CRAs) is critical for the integrity and sustainability of clinical trials in South Africa, an emerging hub for global clinical research. High CRA turnover threatens trial quality, data continuity, and site relationships, yet the context-specific drivers of turnover within the South African clinical research landscape remain poorly understood. This study explores the factors influencing job satisfaction and turnover intentions among CRAs to inform targeted retention strategies. Methods: A qualitative, interpretivist study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Twelve CRAs with experience in South African Contract Research Organizations (CROs) were sampled on LinkedIn using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed iteratively using thematic analysis within Atlas.ti 26.0.1.33961 software, guided by Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory and Mobley’s Turnover Model. Results: The analysis revealed a complex model of turnover drivers. Compensation was the most salient factor, operating not only as a hygiene factor but also as a direct motivator for job mobility in a competitive market. Unsustainable workload and a culture stigmatizing discussions of overload were key push factors. Intrinsic motivators were equally decisive: misalignment with therapeutic area preferences caused profound dissatisfaction, while alignment fostered engagement. Career growth manifested dual pathways: ambition for vertical progression and a redefined search for horizontal growth into roles offering greater work-life flexibility. Conclusions: CRA turnover is driven by an interplay of extrinsic pressures and intrinsic motivational deficits. To enhance retention, managers must adopt a multi-pronged strategy: implement market-competitive, well-being-oriented compensation; foster a culture that supports open workload dialogue; create transparent career architectures with dual progression tracks; and facilitate internal mobility across therapeutic areas. This study provides a foundational framework for developing context-sensitive retention policies, thereby contributing to the stability and quality of clinical research in South Africa.
Matemane et al. (Thu,) studied this question.