Key result
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for selecting the best auscultation area provided a more robust estimate of heart valve closure time compared to single-criteria and single-source methodologies.
Why the study?
Monitoring the time of closure of the four cardiac valves using multi-source PCG could enable home follow-up of patients at risk for heart failure.
Multi-source phonocardiography combined with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis improves the robustness of heart valve closure time estimation, potentially enabling home monitoring for heart failure patients.
In the latest years, multi-source phonocardiography (PCG) is gaining interest in relation to the home monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. An application of interest regards the monitoring of the time of closure of the four cardiac valves, which would enable the follow-up of at-risk patients for heart failure. In this work, we propose a hybrid system based on hierarchical clustering and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for automatically selecting the best auscultation area for the mentioned application through multi-source PCG. We simultaneously recorded 48 PCG signals from the subject's chest and divided them into morphologically homogenous groups using agglomerative hierarchical clustering, based on their correlation. Then, we explored three different approaches to select the best auscultation area, based respectively on the minimum latency, on the maximum signal-to-noise ratio, and on multiple criteria using ELECTRE III. The results obtained on the follow-up of a healthy subject over consecutive days show that a) the selection of the auscultation area using MCDA overcomes the limits of single-criteria approaches, b) the estimate of the time of closure of the heart valves using the proposed system is more robust than what obtained through the state-of-the-art single-source methodology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giordano et al. (2022) studied Healthy (n=1). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for auscultation area selection vs. Single-criteria approaches and single-source methodology was evaluated on Estimation of the time of closure of heart valves. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for selecting the best auscultation area provided a more robust estimate of heart valve closure time compared to single-criteria and single-source methodologies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: