Key result
Patient-specific surgeon volume matching could cut total surgery duration by up to ~9%.
Why the study?
To study how to leverage patient-specific information to improve hospital operational efficiency by evaluating the heterogeneous effects of surgical volume on surgery duration.
Does matching patients with surgeons based on patient-specific volume effects reduce surgery duration in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Observational
Does matching patients with surgeons based on patient-specific volume effects reduce surgery duration in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Effect estimate: 2.5%-8.9% reduction
Leveraging patient-specific information to estimate heterogeneous effects of surgical volume can reduce total surgery duration by 2.5% to 8.9%.
Should not yet alter surgeon assignment in abdominal surgery; leaves open randomized validation of patient-specific volume matching.
Problem definition: We study how to leverage patient-specific information to improve a hospital’s operational efficiency. We use abdominal surgery as the clinical setting and study the heterogeneous effects of surgical volume on surgery duration. We develop a framework for using patient-specific information by addressing three important questions: (1) Is the effect of surgical volume heterogeneous across patients with different features? (2) If so, how could patient-specific information that captures the heterogeneous effects of surgical volume on surgery duration be generated? (3) What is the value of patient-specific information in helping a hospital improve its operational efficiency? Methodology/results: Using an instrumental variable approach to address potential endogeneity issues, we first use a regression model to show that the average effect of surgical volume on surgery duration is significant. Then, we use a regression model with interaction terms to show that the effect of surgical volume is heterogeneous. After that, we apply an instrumental variable forest approach to obtain patient-specific volume effects. Finally, we use patient-specific volume effects and an optimization model to assess the potential value of patient-specific information in improving a hospital’s operational efficiency. We find the that total duration of surgeries could be reduced by 2.5%–8.9% if patient-specific volume effects are considered. Managerial implications: This study provides a framework for understanding treatment effect heterogeneity and using patient-specific information to improve a hospital’s operational efficiency. We provide empirical evidence that the effect of surgical volume is heterogeneous and address the challenges of estimating heterogeneous effects for different patients. Our framework can help hospital administrators to better match patients with surgeons, improving a hospital’s operational efficiency. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0019 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pourghannad et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Abdominal surgery. Surgical volume was evaluated on Total duration of surgeries (2.5%-8.9% reduction). Matching patients with surgeons using patient-specific surgical volume effects could reduce the total duration of surgeries by 2.5% to 8.9%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: