Key result
Standard preoxygenation significantly increases neurodegenerative biomarkers compared to rapid preoxygenation.
Why the study?
Unlimited oxygen therapy is mistakenly thought to be harmless, prompting an investigation into the acute effects of different preoxygenation methods on hemodynamic parameters and neurodegenerative biomarkers.
Does standard preoxygenation increase neurodegenerative biomarkers compared to rapid preoxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
RCT (n=52)
Computer-based random number generator
No
Does standard preoxygenation increase neurodegenerative biomarkers compared to rapid preoxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
p-value: p=<0.001
Rapid preoxygenation may reduce acute neurotoxicity and oxidative stress compared to standard 3-minute preoxygenation during anesthesia induction.
Caution against standard 3-min 100% FiO2 preoxygenation to limit biomarker rises; challenges routine induction protocols and warrants outcome trials.
Background and Objectives: Oxygen is essential for all living organisms and plays a critical role in anesthesia and intensive care practices. However, the notion that unlimited oxygen therapy is harmless is a misconception. Our study investigates the acute effects of different preoxygenation methods on hemodynamic parameters and neurodegenerative biomarkers in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study included 52 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received standard preoxygenation (100% FiO2 for 3 min), while Group II underwent rapid preoxygenation (eight deep breaths over 30 s to 1 min). Hemodynamic parameters (SAP, DAP, MAP, and SpO2) and neurodegenerative biomarkers (pTau, S100B, NSE, NfL, GFAP) were measured after preoxygenation, after intubation, and at the end of surgery. Results: Group I exhibited a significant increase in levels of pTau, S100B, NSE, and GFAP, indicating higher neuronal and glial cell stress compared to Group II (p < 0.001). No significant increase in NfL levels was observed in either group. Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SAP, DAP, MAP) were significantly higher during and after preoxygenation in Group I, suggesting an increased stress response. Group II showed lower levels of acute neurotoxicity and oxidative stress. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that preoxygenation with 100% FiO2 induces stress in neuronal cells, axons, and glial cells, leading to an increase in neurodegenerative biomarkers. Optimizing preoxygenation strategies is crucial to reduce oxidative stress and improve neurological outcomes for surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pehlivan et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=52). Standard preoxygenation vs. Rapid preoxygenation (eight deep breaths over 30 s to 1 min) was evaluated on Neurodegenerative biomarkers (pTau, S100B, NSE, NfL, GFAP) (p=<0.001). Standard preoxygenation with 100% FiO2 for 3 minutes significantly increased levels of neurodegenerative biomarkers (pTau, S100B, NSE, and GFAP) compared to rapid preoxygenation (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: