Why the study?
Persistent mental health issues, doctor suicides, and growing evidence for peer support prompted the implementation of a peer-support programme tailored to the perioperative environment.
Implementation of a formalised peer support programme in an anaesthesia department provides a psychological safety net for staff, particularly following critical incidents.
May support staff wellbeing after critical incidents; leaves open effects on burnout and retention in larger studies.
Recent years have seen a shift in culture surrounding psychological wellbeing in doctors. As suicide continues to devastate medical families, friends and colleagues across the country, and significant rates of mental health issues persist, a greater focus on doctors’ psychological health has emerged. This, coupled with mounting evidence in favour of peer support, has driven the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine to implement a unique peer support programme, which has been tailored to the needs of the perioperative environment. The programme provides a peer-driven, confidential, psychological safety net for all Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital anaesthetic staff. It focuses on collegial support in times of stress, as well as promoting a workplace culture of understanding for staff suffering psychological strain. The benefit of a formalised programme of this kind is that while staff have the option to obtain support at any time from a responder of their choosing, they do not need to seek it out actively in the event of a critical incident when it is automatically provided to them. Consultant anaesthetists trained in psychological first aid act as responders, offering support as well as resources and psychologist referral as required. It is our hope that its success will prompt other anaesthetic departments to continue the trend towards positive health strategies for doctors and implement similar programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slykerman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: