Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Studies in science education demonstrate that laypeople typically engage with science to meet situation-specific needs. Their interest in science often emerges only when it directly helps them solve a particular problem. However, most research in science education has focused on evaluating the trustworthiness of information and the level of understanding required for its use. Less attention has been given to assessing the appropriateness of scientific information for specific purposes while recognizing its limitations. This paper aims to address this gap by proposing a framework to help laypeople evaluate scientific information in a purpose-specific manner. The framework introduced in this paper is based on the philosophical classification of information about causal relations and its relevance to four scientific problems: causal inference, causal explanation, prediction, and control. It categorizes causal information into two types of epistemic games used by scientists: difference-makers search and production-or-mechanisms search. By understanding these games, laypeople can better assess the merits and limitations of scientific information relative to their specific needs. The paper also offers insights into how this framework can be taught in educational settings, with a focus on genetics education as an example. The aim is to enhance students’ capacity to critically engage with scientific information, thereby improving their ability to make informed decisions based on specific needs and challenges.
Haskel‐Ittah et al. (Wed,) studied this question.